One Nation, One Ration Card
Current Affairs
The Supreme Court on Tuesday directed states and Union Territories to implement the One Nation, One Ration Card (ONORC) scheme till July 31 and asked them to run community kitchens to feed migrants till the end of the pandemic.
What is One Nation One Ration Card (ONORC)?
The ONORC scheme is aimed at enabling all beneficiaries, especially migrant workers and their family members to buy subsidised ration from any fair price shop anywhere in the country under the National Food Security Act, 2013.
For instance, a migrant worker from, say, Basti district of Uttar Pradesh will be able to claim Public Distribution System (PDS) benefits in their place of work, say, Mumbai, while the family can continue to go to their ration dealer back home.
How does ONORC work?
ONORC is based on technology that involves details of beneficiaries’ ration card, Aadhaar number and electronic Points of Sale (ePoS).
When a ration card holder goes to a fair price shop, they are identified through biometric authentication on ePoS, which is matched real-time with details on the Annavitaran portal. Once verified, the beneficiary can claim their entitlements. While the Annavitaran portal maintains a record of intra-state transactions, the Integrated Management of Public Distribution System( IM-PDS) portal records the inter-state transactions.
Who will benefit?
As on June 28, there are about 5.46 lakh fair price shops and 23.63 crore ration card holders across the country. Each NFSA ration card holder is assigned to a fair price shop near the place of the ration card registration.81 crore people will gain access to subsidised foodgrains from designated fair price shops under the National Food Security Act, 2013.
When was ONORC launched?
ONORC was launched in August 2019. Work on ration card portability, however, had begun in April 2018 itself, with the launch of the IM-PDS. The idea was to reform the PDS, which has been historically marred by inefficiency and leakages.
What led to the accelerated launch?
ONORC was initially launched as an inter-state pilot. However, when the Covid-19 pandemic forced thousands of migrant workers to return to their villages last year, a need was felt to expedite the rollout. As part of its COVID economic relief package, the government announced the national rollout of ONORC in all states and Union Territories by March 2021.
What’s the current status?
Till date, 32 states and Union Territories have joined the ONORC, covering about 69 crore NFSA beneficiaries. Four states are yet to join the scheme — Assam, Chhattisgarh, Delhi and West Bengal.
According to the Union Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution, about 1.35 crore portability transactions of the ration card are being recorded every month under ONORC on an average to the One Ration Card.
Why are some states lagging?
Delhi is yet to start the use of ePoS in fair price shops, which is a prerequisite for the implementation of ONORC. In the case of West Bengal, the state government has demanded that the non-NFSA ration card holders — ration cards issued by the state government — should also be covered under the ONORC.
Sports commentary: Healthy banter or casual sexism?
Opinion
“Most… batters don’t seem to like their bats. They either like another person’s bat… Bats are like a neighbour’s wife, they always feel better”- Dinesh Karthik while commentating In 2nd ODI between England and Sri Lanka.
"Inhone lockdown me to bas Anushka ki gendon ki practice ki hain"- Sunil Gavaskar while commenting on Virat Kohli’s performance in an IPL match.
These are just two examples of several remarks we often see in sports commentary which can be construed as sexist.
“There is a lot of banter in sports” is the first response you will hear from a lot of people, “it wasn’t mean spirited”, is another. My question here is, whether just banter or light spirited, is it fair or is this casual sexism?
In the name of banter and fun and jokes, women have been subjected to a lot of jokes and while most of the time women simply ignore these, it's time to draw a line.
Why specifically cricket?
Cricket is considered a religion in this country, cricketers’ treated like Gods. No other sport in the country gets as much attention as cricket.
Commentary during cricket matches is a platform with a very wide reach. Commentators need to be mindful of what they are saying. They are the voice of the match and should be more careful with their words, especially while bringing women and the players’ personal life into the comments.
Newlands ball-tampering scandal
In March 2018, during the Newlands ball-tampering scandal, Candice Warner (David Warner's spouse) blamed herself for the fiasco, for letting herself be disturbed by sexually charged abuse from the South African spectators, which in turn affected David Warner and influenced him to react in ways that resulted in ball-tampering.
Warner’s wife was subjected to a lot of harassment from fans but the Australian Cricket Board or their commentators never brought his personal life in question.
BCCI’s intolerance policy: Lopsided?
BCCI's stance against both Hardik Pandya and KL Rahul by fining them INR 20 lakhs after their sexist remarks on the show “Koffee with Karan” became a topic of social media scrutiny, is a clear indicator of BCCI's intolerance policy against such conduct.
Athletes in India should be accorded similar respect, personal lives should be kept away from the game. Internet trolls have enough to say without needing any help from Commentators.
Since the commentators are also representing the BCCI, should they not be held responsible for their remarks as well?
Like what you read? Share this article with your friends and follow us on:
Instagram | Medium | LinkedIn